Taxes

NEW REPORT: U.S. TAX CODE WIDENS GAP BETWEEN WEALTHY AND MIDDLE-CLASS AMERICANS

04/14/2009

The federal tax code has become increasingly unfair over the past 30 years, giving wealthy individuals more breaks than middle- and low-income Americans, according to a new report released today by the Campaign for America’s Future. The report shows that the tax rates on the top 1 percent dropped significantly since 1980, while the relative tax burden on the middle 60 percent has increased.


Sam Pizzigati's picture

Should We Double the Tax Rate on the Rich?

The global meltdown may be shoving high taxes on the rich back onto the political radar screen. The latest sign: a riveting debate in the world's most prestigious business magazine.

More »»


Eric Lotke's picture

April 15: The Issue Is Fairness, Not Taxes

When tax rates were steep, executives had more incentive to leave money in the company —investing for future growth, sharing with staff or hiring more people. Nowadays, with taxes so low, CEOs have more incentive simply to pay themselves. That’s a recipe for greed, not growth.

More »»

Gilded Age Taxation

Who pays taxes, and who reaps the benefits of an unfair tax code? Income inequality between 1980 and 2006 has gone up 144 percent between the top one percent of taxpayers and the middle 60 percent, even as top-end tax rates have declined 15 percent for the top one percent during that same period. This is the result of bad policy choices that can be reversed. This report explains how three decades of tax policy have led to Gilded Age inequality and outlines some steps to make the tax code more progressive. more »


Sam Pizzigati's picture

Getting Past Philanthropic Foolery

The debate over the Obama proposal to limit the tax deductions the rich can take on charitable donations has so far revolved around questions over whether the wealthy would give less if they couldn’t deduct as much. The more basic question: Just how much are the rich now really giving?

More »»

Small Business Tax Hoax

CONservative Spin:

“President Obama's budget proposal would increase taxes on a large percentage of small businesses. ”
Isaiah J. Poole's picture

PROgressive Response:

In fact, according to the Tax Policy Center's table of 2007 tax returns that reported small-business income, 481,000 of those returns—about 2 percent—are in the top two income tax brackets, which include all filers with taxable incomes that would be affected by Obama's proposals to let portions of the Bush tax cuts for wealthy taxpayers expire and to reduce the tax rate at which families making more than $250,000 could take itemized deductions.

Even though only two percent of people who are classified as small-business owners would see a tax increase under President Obama's policies, Media Matters reports that many media figures and outlets—including CNBC host Joe Kernen, CNBC host Maria Bartiromo, ABC News' Jake Tapper, CNN's Dana Bash, Fox News' Sean Hannity, CNN's David Gergen, Politico, the Associated Press, The Washington Post, and The New York Times—have advanced, uncritically repeated, or failed to challenge the debunked Republican falsehood that Obama's income tax proposals would increase taxes on a large percentage of small businesses. For example, Kernen didn't challenge Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., on the March 26 edition of CNBC's Squawk Box after Gregg referred to Obama's proposal as a "tax policy that basically is focused on raising taxes on small businesses especially."

 Source
Isaiah J. Poole's picture

The "Tax Freedom Day" Scam

The Tax Foundation releases an annual report that declares a "Tax Freedom Day," the day at which "Americans...have earned enough money to pay this year's tax obligations at the federal, state and local levels." This year, that date falls on April 13.

Conservatives use the Tax Foundation report to get people riled up about the amount of taxes they pay. But the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities says the Tax Freedom Day brouhaha is deceptive. The reason is simple: The Tax Foundation only looks at taxes as a percentage of the total economy. But that doesn't take into account the reality of the average family. Because the federal tax system is progressive, the share of income that most Americans pay in federal taxes is considerably lower than the overall level of revenues as a share of total national income. In fact, about 80 percent of U.S. households pay federal tax at rates lower than the Tax Foundation’s reported average, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

But the even more fundamental fallacy is that people spend part of the year working for "the government" and the rest of the year working for themselves and their families. Government tax dollars also serve you and your family—or at least they should. Conservatives use rhetorical gimmicks like "Tax Freedom Day" to drive a wedge between government and the people (but use government to serve their friends and supporters). Progressives work to make sure government serves the public good. There's no need to declare a "tax freedom day"; we need to stay focused on making sure government works as it should for all of us.


Sam Pizzigati's picture

Incendiary Data in a Plain Paper Journal

If Americans ever really digested the sort of statistics that appear regularly in the IRS research quarterly, the resulting storm of protest might make the rage over AIG seem about as fearsome as a tantrum from a toddler.

More »»


Sam Pizzigati's picture

Is Taxing the Super Rich a Waste of Time?

America's most financially fortunate, the cagier critics of President Obama are claiming, can sidestep any hike in the tax rate on high incomes. But history tells a different story.

More »»

Progressive Tax Policies Won't Harm Small Businesses

CONservative Spin:

“The tax increases proposed by the Obama administration for people earning more than $250,000 a year will hurt small businesses, and will lead to less job creation and investment. ”
Isaiah J. Poole's picture

PROgressive Response:

The number of small-business owners who would be affected by this tax increase would actually be very small, according to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities and the Brookings Tax Policy Center.

First, less than 9 percent of people with any small business income have incomes of over $250,000. The remainder would actually get a tax cut under President Obama's tax plan. Second, only 1.9 percent of small-business owners pay taxes at above the 28 percent tax bracket. Third, many of the people who would be affected by the proposed tax increase are actually passive investors who have no direct role in managing the businesses, including multimillion-dollar hedge-fund managers. Plus, small businesses whose owners are paying taxes on their profits at the personal tax rate have other options for lowering their tax bill.

What small-business owners will get with this tax change, however, is policies that will lower their health care costs over time, help them shift to green-energy sources, strengthen schools so they can draw from a better-educated labor pool and a better transportation grid for their goods and their workers. And those changes will have a positive impact on their bottom line that will outweigh the small tax increase a few might pay.

 Source

Chye-Ching Huang, Jason Levitis, and James Horney, "Very Few Small Business Owners Would Face Tax Increases Under President Obama's Budget," Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, February 28. 2009.