prescription drugs

Part-D Designed with Unnecessary Administrative Costs

CONservative Spin:

“if the federal government begins picking drugs and setting prices for all Medicare beneficiaries, administrative costs would add a new burden to taxpayers.”
 Source

Mike Leavitt, "Medicare And the Market," The Washington Post, January 11, 2007." Retrieved on December 14, 2007, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011002020.html.

Isaiah J. Poole's picture

CAF STAFF

PROgressive Response:

The government's administrative expense to run the Medicare program accounts for only 3% of Medicare spending. By contrast, the amount of every premium dollar retained by private insurance companies for marketing, administration and profit is 14%. The CBO has projected that the marketing and the profits of the insurance industry would add $38 billion in costs in the first seven years of the program compared to a benefit that was administered through Medicare.

Question to ask: "Why was Part D designed to hit seniors and taxpayers with such high and unnecessary administrative costs?

 Source

CMS, Office of the Actuary, National Health Expenditures, Table 11. Calendar year 2005. Retrieved on December 14, 2007, from, http://www.cms.hhs.gov/NationalHealthExpendData/downloads/tables.pdf.

 Source

"Medicare For All: Quality, Affordable, Health Care for All Americans,” by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Retrieved on December 14, 2007, from http://energycommerce.house.gov/medicare/M4A_factsheet.pdf.

 Source

Congressional Budget Office, 2004a. “A Detailed Description of CBO's Cost Estimate for the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit,” Washington, D.C.: Congressional Budget Office, Table 3. Retrieved on December 14, 2007, from http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdoc.cfm?index=5668&type=0&sequence=0.

Veterans and the VA Formulary

CONservative Spin:

“the VA formulary excludes a number of new drugs covered by the Medicare prescription benefit.”
 Source

Mike Leavitt, "Medicare And the Market," The Washington Post, January 11, 2007." Retrieved on December 14, 2007, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011002020.html.

Bill Scher's picture

CAF STAFF

PROgressive Response:

The 1,300 drugs on the Veterans Administration formulary account for the vast majority of prescriptions that are filled by people on Medicare - and Veterans can still get the drugs not on the VA formulary. They just need to have their doctor explain why they need the drug in question.

Additionally, no plans in the Medicare program cover all 4,300 FDA approved drugs. These plans have preferred drugs as well, which is why the typical beneficiary had to spend 8 hours last year sifting through the various options, according to a study done for the Medicare Payments Advisory Commission. Seniors with many drug needs presumably spent even more time.

Question to ask: Why has the VA received significantly higher marks than private health care in independent surveys of customer satisfaction for the past 7 years?

 Source

Baker, Dean. "Post Pushes Drug Industry Line, Again," The American Prospect Online Edition, January 13, 2007. Retrieved on December 14, 2007, from http://www.prospect.org/deanbaker/2007/01/post_pushes_drug_industry_line.html.

 Source

"VA Health Care System Outscores Private Sector Again," the Veterans Administration, January 10, 2007. Retrieved on December 14, 2007, from http://www1.va.gov/opa/pressrel/index.cfm.

Current System Less Effective

CONservative Spin:

“The federal government has nowhere near the market power of the private sector. Private-sector insurance plans and pharmacy benefit managers, which negotiate prices between drug companies and pharmacies, cover about 241 million people, or 80 percent of the population. Medicare could cover at most 43 million. ”
 Source

Mike Leavitt, "Medicare And the Market," The Washington Post, January 11, 2007." Retrieved on December 14, 2007, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011002020.html.

Roger Hickey's picture

CAF STAFF

PROgressive Response:

The total size of the private sector doesn't matter. It does not negotiate with drug companies as a sector—which is why we need Medicare to do it. The thousands of different private insurance plans that negotiate individually are far less effective than Medicare could be.

Also important is that Medicare-covered elderly have higher prescription drug use. For example, people 75 years of age and older take an average of 7.9 prescribed drugs per person per day.

Question to ask: If Medicare can't negotiate for lower drug prices as well as the private plans, why is the prescription drug lobby spending so much money fighting against allowing Medicare to do just that?

 Source

"Medication Digest,” the American Pharmacists Association, 2003

Drug Companies Spend More on Marketing than Development

CONservative Spin:

“it would harm drug makers' budgets for research and development.”
 Source

Bruce Jaspin, "With Dems in power, Part D could get a makeover," Chicago Tribune, November 12, 2006. Retrieved on December 14, 2007, from http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06316/737432-321.stm.

Bill Scher's picture

CAF STAFF

PROgressive Response:

The largest U.S.-based drug companies spent more than twice as much on marketing, advertising, and administration as they spent on R&D (32% percent versus 13.9% of revenues), and they retained more in profits than they spent on R&D (17.4% versus 13.9%).

Question to as: Doesn't this directly contradict their other claims that negotiating for lower prices will be ineffective?

 Source

"No Bargain: Medicare Drug Plans Deliver High Prices," Families USA, January 9, 2007. Retrieved from on December 14, 2007, from http://www.familiesusa.org/assets/pdfs/no-bargain-medicare-drug.pdf.

Millions Rejected the Medicare Drug Program

CONservative Spin:

“the cost of the drug benefit is lower than expected.”
 Source

Robert Pear. "House Democrats Pass Bill on Medicare Drug Prices," The New York Times, January 13, 2007. Retrieved on December 14, 2007, from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/13/washington/13drug.html.

Robert Dorst2's picture

PROgressive Response:

Related Topics:

The costs are lower than expected mainly because millions of expected enrollees have decided that the Medicare drug program is not a good deal and haven't signed up - giving more reason to fix Part D and make it simpler and cheaper.

Question to ask: If the costs are already so low, why is PhRMA spending so much money fighting this proposal?

Prescription Drugs Benefit

CONservative Spin:

“as many as 40 percent of veterans eligible for both the Medicare drug benefit and the Veterans Affairs drug plan have opted for the Medicare plan”
 Source

"PhRMA Statement on New Families USA Report," PhRMA, January 9, 2007. Retrieved on December 14, 2007, from http://www.phrma.org/news_room/press_releases/phrma_statement_on_new_families_usa_report/.

Robert Borosage's picture

CAF STAFF

PROgressive Response:

It is important to realize that this includes all the workers who get retiree health benefits and all the Medicare beneficiaries who get supplemental insurance. These plans receive subsidies through Part D and therefore their beneficiaries are counted as being enrolled in the program. There has been no mass rejection of the VA system, these veterans simply have been categorized as being covered by Part D.

Question to ask: Why has the VA received significantly higher marks than private health care in independent surveys of customer satisfaction for the past 7 years?

 Source

Baker, Dean. "Misleading the Public on Medicare Drugs," The American Prospect Online Edition, January 11, 2007. Retrieved on December 14, 2007, from http://www.prospect.org/deanbaker/2007/01/misleading_the_public_on_medic.html.

Reduce Prescription Costs

CONservative Spin:

“seniors and people with disabilities like the benefit. Studies consistently show that three-quarters of Medicare beneficiaries are satisfied with their coverage.”
 Source

Mike Leavitt, "Medicare And the Market," The Washington Post, January 11, 2007." Retrieved on December 14, 2007, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011002020.html.

Roger Hickey's picture

CAF STAFF

PROgressive Response:

85% of American adults favor allowing the federal government to use its buying power to negotiate with drug companies to try to get a lower price for Medicare prescription drugs.

76% of American adults favor Allowing seniors the choice of obtaining their prescription drug plan directly from Medicare - instead of from a private insurance company.

Question to ask: Wouldn't seniors be more satisfied with lower drug prices? And why not save taxpayer money?

 Source

"The Public’s Health Care Agenda for the New Congress and Presidential Campaign," The Kaiser Family Foundation/Harvard School of Public Health, December, 2006. Retrieved on December 14, 2007, from http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/upload/7598.pdf.

Economic Impacts of Prescription Drug Plan

CONservative Spin:

“it would save little money because private health insurance providers already negotiate lower prices with drug companies.”
Isaiah J. Poole's picture

CAF STAFF

PROgressive Response:

The top 20 drugs prescribed to seniors are on average 58% cheaper under the Veterans Administration, which uses its bulk purchasing power to negotiate for lower drug prices, than under the 5 largest Part D service providers.

Question to ask: If Medicare can't negotiate as well as the private plans, why is PhRMA spending so much money fighting this proposal?

 Source

"No Bargain: Medicare Drug Plans Deliver High Prices," Families USA, January 9, 2007. Retrieved from on December 14, 2007, from http://www.familiesusa.org/assets/pdfs/no-bargain-medicare-drug.pdf.

Why is the Costly, Confusing Part D Prescription Drug Program Dropping Millions of Seniors into the Donut Hole?

Answer: Failed Conservative Ideology

Millions of seniors on Medicare are falling into the prescription drug coverage gap known as the donut hole, in which they get no coverage at all even while still paying monthly premiums. more »

Roger Hickey's picture

CAF STAFF

Coverage Gap Linked to Deaths

According to a June, 2006 article in the New England Journal of Medicine, seniors hit with a coverage gap like the Part D donut hole are 22% more likely to die than seniors who aren't forced to pay th more »

Source