The Case

The Basics

Why Social Security?

A conservative assault on Social Security was turned back during President Bush’s second term. But we have a long way to go before all Americans can count on dignified rest after years of hard work.

The Challenge

The disappearance of pensions and decline in personal savings only heightens the importance and necessity of protecting Social Security.

Conservative Failure

The very success of Social Security as a program of shared security has made it a conservative target. Conservatives would rather turn Social Security stakeholders into Wall Street “investors” — with no guarantees and inadequate protections.

Progressive Solution

Progressives need to take a broad and bold approach to preserving and enhancing Social Security to ensure a secure retirement for all Americans.

Elevator Speech

There simply is no reason for any American worker to live his or her final years in poverty.

Talking Points

Molly Swartz's picture

CAF STAFF

Retirement with Dignity

We need to make it possible for all Americans to retire with dignity at the end of a lifetime of work. more »

Chris Collins's picture

CAF STAFF

The Privatization Threat Is Back

Prominent Republicans have come out publicly in past weeks stating that, given the chance in 2007, they will push Social Security privatization again. This includes...

Pro vs. Con

CONservative Spin:

“This is not an argument about ending Social Security; what conservatives want to do is give people better options for their retirement.”
Bill Scher's picture

CAF STAFF

PROgressive Response:

Related Topics:

Conservatives opposed Social Security from the time it was conceived by President Franklin D. Roosevelt during the Great Depression. Their continued disdain for the program was vividly displayed in a memo by Peter Wehner, President Bush's director of strategic initiatives and an aide to Bush advisor Karl Rove, who wrote, "For the first time in six decades, the Social Security battle is one we can win."