While many see the automotive industry crisis as an opportunity to help address our clean energy needs, conservatives see an opportunity to make workers earn less.
The Examiner editorial page [1] claims:
The basic reason why Asian automakers make money on their U.S. plants and the Big Three don’t is because the latter must pay union wages that average $60,000 annually, plus gold-pated pension and health care benefits that double that amount per worker.
Left unmentioned is that Asian got ahead of the curve on building energy-efficient cars while Big 3 resisted higher fuel-efficiency standards, and Asian countries have universal health care [2] which lightens the load on businesses.
But mentioned is that this supposedly lavish union pay package gives auto workers a whopping $60,000 a year. How dare these auto workers try to raise families on slightly above the median household income! [3]
Yet New York Times columnist Tom Friedman jumps on the union-bashing bandwagon. [4] The Wall Street Journal characterizes the Big 3 automakers as "money-losing, unionized manufacturers," which threatens their "viability."
Jonathan Tasini has a few words [5] for the wage-haters:
Now, some will say: well, why should UAW members get such "rich" contracts? Let's first get real. UAW members are not living large, though compared to Wal-Mart workers they are better off.
And its not UAW pensions that are a problem. Its CEO pensions [6], for example, that are weighing down the auto companies, particularly GM.
But here is the larger point: if you tear up union contracts and cut wages and benefits, how the hell do our brilliant leaders think the consumer-driven economy will work? People are totally maxed out on their credit cards. Home equity cash is gone. If you cut wages, exactly how will 70 percent of the economy--consumer spending--be generated?
Any taxpayer funded-bailout should reap rewards for taxpayers, namely by helping us rapidly move to a clean energy economy. [7]
Kneecapping taxpaying workers is not a good use of our taxpayer dollars.
UPDATE: Digby [8] has more on the latest wave of union-bashing.
UPDATE 2: Tasini has more details [9] on what those fat cat UAW workers actually make in salary and benefits.
Links:
[1] http://www.dcexaminer.com/opinion/No_Bailout_Without_Big_Changes_in_Detroit.html
[2] http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS115499 19-Jun-2008 PRN20080619
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income_in_the_United_States
[4] http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/12/opinion/12friedman.html?em
[5] http://www.workinglife.org/blogs/view_post.php?content_id=10178
[6] http://www.workinglife.org/blogs/view_post.php?content_id=5132
[7] http://ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2008114610/next-bailout-handouts-or-hybrids
[8] http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2008114613/stickin-it-unions
[9] http://www.workinglife.org/blogs/view_post.php?content_id=10188