"Obama's Marxist Harpy Wife" - [Updated!]

That's how a writer for the prominent conservative blog redstate.com [1] described her. I copied the first bit of text in the post here [2], but since the whole post has been disappeared from the site this is all I've got (it wasn't up long enough to be cached apparently):

Is Obama Shagging Hookers Behind the Media's Back?

I assume not. I assume that Obama's marxist harpy wife would go Lorena Bobbit on him should he even think about it, but I ask the question to make one simple point: Barack Obama, like Elliott Spitzer, is a creation of the liberal media and, as a result, could be a serial killing transvestite and the media would turn a blind eye. Elliott...

Yes, forget all those silly voters! The whole thing was pretty crazy (I read it in my feedreader but closed it before realizing the post was gone from the main site) and I can see why they took it down, but go read the whole site to get a feel for the half-crazed fury that's possessing modern conservatives. It's a scary sight, and a scary site.

Update: Found it [3]! The "marxist harpy" bit is the most remarkable, but the the whole thing is striking for the contempt with which the author, Erick Erickson the "Editor and Chairman of the Board" who runs the website full time, regards Obama:

Barack Obama could be pillaging poor people in Chicago, shagging every hooker in Washington, D.C., and going to Communist Party meetings with his wife and the media would (A) never look into it and (B) never mention it even if they knew. Obama, after all, represents audacious hope and change.

Obama is a media generated product. Few of his supporters can tell us what substantive issues he stands for beyond hope and change. His Illinois voting record is barely mentioned by the press. The background of his church, which would be deeply investigated by every major reporter were he a Republican, has been ignored.*

But I suspect that will now change. With the implosion of Elliott Spitzer and Obama's own campaign's implosion, the media is starting to see the error of their ways. The media, though harboring deep hatred toward the Clintons', does not want to be on the losing team. And the writing is more clearly starting to appear on the wall. Obama is failing to catch on. His state victories look impressive in terms of quantity, but the internal numbers show a man unable to garner significant support across party lines and outside of caucus states.

I say again what I've said before: Obama is a weaker candidate that Clinton. And the shtick of his surrogates screaming racism whenever anyone mentions his shallowness or middle name will not play in the general election like it does in the primary. After all, his middle name is what it is and he is a shallow man lacking much substance to the right of George McGovern.

Also, Erickson put the post up on his personal blog where it remains [4].