Social Contract

Top Stories

Featured Issues

The Facts

The Next Austerity Disaster

NUMBER 11 | January 28, 2013

The leaders of both political parties suggest that more deficit reduction is needed and that it would help the economy. Not surprisingly, polls suggest that most Americans believe that cutting spending will help the economy, not harm the recovery. The reality is that spending is not out of control, the deficit is already plummeting, and we should be focused on fixing the economy to make it work for working people, not on austerity driven by wrong-headed deficit hysteria.

more »

Holding the Economy Hostage

NUMBER 10 | January 22, 2013

Conservatives are trying to extort unpopular cuts in vital programs by holding the economy hostage. In total, the White House has agreed to spending cuts that total $1.5 trillion (or $1.7 trillion including interest savings) over 10 years. And the New Year’s “fiscal cliff” deal will raise $600 billion in taxes over 10 years. But all that has only encouraged them. Now they have triggered the biggest set of austerity bombs in history to go off this spring if they don’t get their way. Holding America hostage is a ridiculous way to negotiate a budget. It is time to say, "No more."

more »

The Case

Making Voting Constitutional

Early last year, when Attorney General Eric Holder took a strong stand against voter-identification laws, he emphasized how much they violate core American ideals. “What we are talking here is a constitutional right,” he said. “This is not a privilege. The right to vote is something that is fundamental to who we are as Americans. We have people who have given their lives—people have sacrificed a great deal in order for people to have the right to vote. It’s what distinguishes the United States from most other countries.” The problem is: Eric Holder is wrong. Unlike citizens in every other advanced democracy—and many other developing ones—Americans don’t have a right to vote. Popular perception notwithstanding, the Constitution provides no explicit guarantee of voting rights. more »

Employees? Consumers? Feh!

Should the Supreme Court uphold it, last Friday’s decision by three Reagan-appointees to the D.C. Circuit Appellate Court appears at first glance to rejigger the balance of power between Congress and the president. The appellate justices struck down three recess appointments that President Obama had made to the five-member National Labor Relations Board during the break between the 2011 and 2012 sessions of Congress partly on the grounds that Congress wasn’t formally in recess. It’s not that Obama has made a lot of recess appointments. He’s only made 32—compared to the 171 made by George W. Bush. Presidents have been making recess appointments since the mid-19th century, but this is the first time that the courts have objected. Certainly, the three judges on the D.C. appellate court voiced no such opinions when Bush was president. The real issue here is who Obama appointed, and to what agencies. more »

Latest from our Bloggers