Senate Making "Stimulus" Better and Worse?
By David Sirota
January 29, 2008 - 10:56am ET
Popular This Week
"Deem and Pass" Is NOT "Without A Vote"
The ‘Party of No’ May Now Rate a New Label
Also Worth Reading
I've already written about why the current "stimulus" package is bad - but it seems like Senate Democrats might change it - some for the better, and much for the worse. The Politico reports that Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) "is proposing adding 13 weeks to unemployment insurance" and "Other senators want to add food stamp funding, Medicaid money for states, infrastructure spending for roads and bridges and money for summer job programs." That's great. However, here's where it gets bad:
"The Senate may lift the $150,000 household income cap ($75,000 for individuals) for eligibility for tax rebates...Baucus is also considering a series of tax measures not in the House bill, including a proposal to allow businesses to reach back five years - instead of the current two year limit - to take tax write offs on net losses."
This is typically how it works in Washington - anything that's done on behalf of the majority of Americans comes attached to another giveaway for corporations and the rich.
Views expressed on this page are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Campaign
for America's Future or Institute for America's Future

Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Propeller
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
