A Public Health Insurance Plan: Reducing Costs and Improving Quality

URL:

Abstract:

President Barack Obama, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus and others have proposed frameworks for reforming the health care system that would allow Americans to keep their employer-provided coverage or, if they do not have such coverage obtain it through a public or private insurance plan that is available through a “national health insurance exchange,” where plans would compete with each other for members. Like the public fee-for-service Medicare plan, the new public health insurance plan in this exchange would be managed by the federal government but would pay private health care providers to deliver care.

This report explains why a public health insurance plan that competes on a level playing field with private insurance plans in an exchange offers the best promise for reining in health care costs, encouraging greater efficiency and quality, and providing people with financial security. Moreover, authoritative studies show that the savings that can be achieved by insuring millions of people in a public health insurance plan may be enough to pay for covering the 46 million Americans currently without insurance.

The findings in this report are based on comparing information that is available about Medicare’s public health insurance plan (the traditional fee- for-service program); Medicare Advantage plans, which are run by private insurers; and the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, which offers private insurance through an exchange only available to federal employees.

This report highlights the proven track record of significant cost savings that have been achieved under Medicare’s public health insurance plan relative to private insurance and ways to improve upon Medicare in constructing a new public health insurance plan for people under age 65.